Your post here is very well written, I think you have done an excellent job in laying out precise elements of our "Legal System" that is tied into the Economic and Political spheres. I usually point out that LAW and Legalyte are not the same as Lawfulness. I tend to think that Common Law operates with a stronger connection to what is "Lawful," because of our choices of conduct between ourselves in a natural community setting. Common Law is by no means perfect either.
In this post, I also reference most of my source info on how the Trust System is really at the core of Monetary Policies, Government Policies, Corporate Control of Equities, Land Ownership, how the Corporate Government is ruling from behind a curtain, while most people are fooled into accepting the Government as a Republic. There are many dimensions to this. In this post, I referenced another substack; that corroborates the items in my post:
There is a commenter in American Hypnotist's post that everyone should read:
He goes by "Bitter Root Services" I think the comment approximately half way down, he describes "why" the whole Globalist, Centralized System seems to keep going and why the Power to "control" something is seemingly more attractive than "owning" something.
Trusts are like Russian nesting dolls. Trust can exist inside of Trusts, inside of Trust, inside of.... well you get the idea.
In my post, Corporate Chains of Custody there is a diagram of approximately how this looks, a picture is worth a thousand words.
Bitter Root had a most wonderful exchange with myself and others; important and informative enough that I printed it out. Here is a direct link to the comment section, if you would like to check it out; I hope you will. ;-)
The Wars in the last 400 years have ALL been fought for the sake of the Banker Parasites; this includes the Revolutionary War, although the results after the establishment of the Constitution makes the Revolutionary War seem like just a Civil War. The first system we had in place was the Articles of Confederation, a decentralized system that reinforced the Sovereign aspect of Statehood to the States. There's a lot of detail to be discussed in the Federalist vs Anti Federalist issue, as well as why the Whiskey and Shay Rebellion took place ---- it has everything to do with the Bank of London; the Bankers had a stake in our Revolutionary War because the Founders "borrowed" money to fight it. When the loans became due, nobody wanted to pay them back, rightly so. Ironically, the King of Britain also borrowed money from the same Bankers. So both sides were funded by the same parasites.
We need to be seeking the right tools to take away from the Parasites. They primarily rely on us "Agreeing" to acquiesce. In my view, we could all Declare Individual Sovereignty, refuse to use the monetary system, refuse to "Register" our children with a "Cestue Que Vie" Birth Certificate. Establishing a strictly localized format for our communities, growing our own food, bartering and exchanging services.
Thank you so much for your kind words. I read your article from your comment on my other post. Great article. It was on energy vibration and frequency. Tho mine was not at the depth or level of yours. I will definately check your links out. Always enjoy learning new things and you sent me down a couple of rabbit holes already... Thank you again sir... Peace...
The idea of individual sovereignty goes back at least as far as Ancient Britain. "The whole Island was considered to be under one Crown—the crown itself subject to the "Voice of the Country"; hence the maxim, "the Country is higher than the King," which runs through the Ancient British Laws, and was directly opposed to the Feudal system in which the country itself was dealt with as the property of the King" - as practised in Continental Europe. All Britons were sovereign. The King was no more and no less than the first among equals.
Thank you for your comment, I haven't really studied English Law and was not aware of that. "Voice of the Country" is similar to We The People. But it leaves itself open to different interpretations. Not sure if it was used on any documents. Where as We The People as the post stated are the first 3 words of The Constitution for the united States of America... Again Thank you for such a wonderful comment. Peace...
Weren't both The Republic and the federal government declared bankrupt and dissolved by FDR in The Emergency Banking Act 1933? If so, does the Constitution still apply and, if so, which one and how, please?
It's interesting to note that the idea of unalienable rights comes from the ancient Usages of Britain, which are themselves based on the laws of Troy and Ancient Greece, brought to Britain by Brutus of Troy after The Trojan War around 485 BC. "The Usages of Britain could not be altered by any act or edict of the Crown or National Convention. They were considered the inalienable rights to which every Briton was born and of which no human legislation could deprive him. Many of these usages are remarkable for their humane and lofty spirit: for instance, "There are three things belonging to a man, from which no law can separate him—his wife, his children, and the instruments of his calling; for no law can unman a man, or uncall a calling."
The most learned Jurists refer the original Institutes of our Island to the Trojan Law brought by Brutus. Lord Chief Justice Coke (Preface to Vol. iii. of Reports), affirms, "the Original Laws of this land were composed of such elements as Brutus first selected from the Ancient Greek and Trojan Institutions" ("History of Britain," (1848) by R W Morgan).
Thank you for the brief lesson on the origin of unalienable rights. And the kind words I also like your awesome question. I will have to conduct some research into the FDR issue. But in my initial view of the issue. Since I'm one of We The People, The constitution is a governmental services contract of which has very limited jurisdiction over me, a Living man of the Land jurisdiction. I would claim the President doesn't have the authority to abolish something he didn't create, That would revert to We The People. As we Created the contract. But I'm not completely sure and would have to conduct some research to confirm my suspicions. And any good investigator doesn't ask questions he doesn't have the answers to. So by your structure and word usage. I have to assume you know the answer to the question you propose. So I will have to get back to you on that... Thanks again for the wonderful comment.... Peace...
Unfortunately, I'm an interested layman rather than a knowledgeable one; so a lot of this information goes over my head and I tend to use language too loosely. When I wrote "FDR," I meant during his administration, ie, 1933. I guess The Emergency Banking Act went through Congress before FDR gave it presidential assent.
I will need to conduct the research to find the sources of information, but from my information I was told that the United States Inc. has been bankrupt 3 times with the most recent being in 2003. Since the size of the corporation the final distribution of assets occurred in 2019 when Trump put the Federal Reserve under the US Treasury. Completing the third and Final Bankruptsy. Thus Trumps inauguration address of giving the Government back to the People. Trump has been bankrupt at a higher level than most so he understands the process better than most. Like I said this is third hand information so it's heresay. I would have to research each to obtain sources that are reliable before I could say all of that is actually factually true. But with good common sense it feels true. Thank you for your response for clarification. as many who read the comments on this post will be helped by your and my questions.... Peace...
Yes, I have heard that, too. It all sounds rather fake and fanciful to me. It also raises the question of why everything in "Our democracy" appears to have to be done in secret and by deception. Cui bono? It reminds me of the alleged courts martial and executions at Guantanamo. Does justice not only need to be done, but to be seen to be done? Having said all that, truth does have a habit of being stranger than fiction! Best of luck with your researches - and thanks again!
The deception is required, and so is the hiding of any trials. They are taking down a mafia that has existed for 1000's of years. A fracture occurred in the timing of the evil that allowed for a plan to be implemented to eliminate them. If we know they would know. The plan sat on a shelf for almost a century before the Assassination of JFK. The plan was dusted off and reworked. It's a dynamic situation, moves and counter moves. You are watching a movie, nothing is as it seems. Good guys are actually bad guys and bad guys are actually good guys.. One aspect of the deep state is anything the media spews put it to a mirror and turn it upside down and you are closer to the truth.... It's gonna get rough.. The roller coaster hit the high point and we are heading for the downfall into the loop de loops.... Just my humble opinion... Peace...
Law is nothing without thugs (policw) enforcing it and you accepting it.
If a contract is broken... as this is clearly... we don't need to obey... neither the police nor the IRS nor anyone especially not politicians who are all guilty as charged and should be shot.
I read your first article, I agree with the general focus of the article. Your use of the word democracy distracts from the document. We are supposed to be a Federal Republic. You wont find the word in the text of the Constitution. Also you mentioned the word Citizen, that word has 2 meanings. The first is the allegiance we hold to a country or the country we were born in. The second meaning is convoluted in dictionaries but the basis you will find is these two words. Subject To... Who's subject are you? I avoid that word without clarification. Thank you for your awesome response to my post I hope it made some sense to you... Get back on the Land jurisdiction!!! Peace..
Words have meanings, especially in LAW.. So if you are going to try to change a system that involves legal issues you need to know the rules of their game. We The People are supposed to be following "The Laws of Nature or of Nature's God" But too many people think they are U.S. Citizens which are corporate slaves and not free sovereigns. The founding fathers created a nation of sovereigns.
The more you know, the more you realize how much you don't know... Peace...
Great post GW. On Trump, the so-called attempts were theater to promote polarization and other things not actual assassination attempts. Proof here, a vid that is buried by hoards of distraction vids: https://www.bitchute.com/video/AVkZbQMrZ5iK
Again, this is your area of expertise, and I have very little exposure to that. My point wasn't on the assassination attempts, but how alphabet agencies that are no where in the constitution are putting boots on the necks of patriots illegally. I was making a point on the tyranny of the Federal Corporation. Thanks again for the added information on the video evidence. Peace...
Thanks for the kind words, I have no expertise in those areas so I cannot confirm nor discredit any of the information. With AI and video editing software of which I have very little exposure to I would have to leave that up to the experts like you... Peace...
Actually it's all analog thinking. No matter what vid you see, incl the MSM that wants you to think he was shot, the 3rd shot is when he ducked. At that time all vids that show the shooter see him pointed away from DJT. This is one of the only vids showing the sounds, DJT, and the shooter in the same frame. But with any of the other multiple vids showing when DJT ducks on shot 3 and the shooter facing away on separate vids, this vid is nearly undebunkable.
All even besides the fact that the SS didn't clear the roof of a nearby bldg? They are that inept? And ears bleed profusely not like DJT's small drips and the odds of a micro meter graze are about a trillion to one compared to a miss or full hit, and they they do this BS shooting with squibs (blood packets) all the time and just when DJT ducked he could have easily hit ear with squibb...well the word assassination attempt should be the last choice on the list.
I love healthy scepticism, The 13 independent nation states united for international commerce. They had to create a vehicle to all agree on how that was going to be conducted. It holds all of the elements of a legal contract very similar to the structure of a corporation under law. But the founders didn't create a corporation. The created a governmental services organization. Read the document to fully understand the organization and structure. We The People, Joe the plumber, Sally the seamstress, Bill the electrician are supposed to be occupying Congress, Not some corporate shill that lives off the trough. When Joe, Sally, or Bill are done with their term, they go back home and tend to their trade. The Federal offices were never supposed to be full time jobs... Thanks for the great comment... Peace...
I've often thought it would be interesting to appoint members of Congress for strictly limited terms using the same method used to select people for jury service (which I presume is a random method?).
Thank you for this. Lots of good and important information.
I suspect you are aware of Anna Von Reitz who has put out a lot of similar information? I believe she places the capture of our country back to the civil war.
She has a process people can follow to reclaim their identities based on the land and the state they were born into VS the maritime scam that re-identified us. Jordan Maxwell also discussed this subject.
excellent comparison. Clearly shows we've been hijacked along the way. Maybe the 1800s mudfloods gave them a chance to take over what we once started. Then made us a corporation. This outline clearly shows the difference we should be than what we are now
Your post here is very well written, I think you have done an excellent job in laying out precise elements of our "Legal System" that is tied into the Economic and Political spheres. I usually point out that LAW and Legalyte are not the same as Lawfulness. I tend to think that Common Law operates with a stronger connection to what is "Lawful," because of our choices of conduct between ourselves in a natural community setting. Common Law is by no means perfect either.
In October of last year, I posted this:
https://nefahotep.substack.com/p/corporate-chains-of-custody-illustrate
In this post, I also reference most of my source info on how the Trust System is really at the core of Monetary Policies, Government Policies, Corporate Control of Equities, Land Ownership, how the Corporate Government is ruling from behind a curtain, while most people are fooled into accepting the Government as a Republic. There are many dimensions to this. In this post, I referenced another substack; that corroborates the items in my post:
https://badlands.substack.com/p/its-all-about-trust-law by American Hypnotist.
There is a commenter in American Hypnotist's post that everyone should read:
He goes by "Bitter Root Services" I think the comment approximately half way down, he describes "why" the whole Globalist, Centralized System seems to keep going and why the Power to "control" something is seemingly more attractive than "owning" something.
Trusts are like Russian nesting dolls. Trust can exist inside of Trusts, inside of Trust, inside of.... well you get the idea.
In my post, Corporate Chains of Custody there is a diagram of approximately how this looks, a picture is worth a thousand words.
Bitter Root had a most wonderful exchange with myself and others; important and informative enough that I printed it out. Here is a direct link to the comment section, if you would like to check it out; I hope you will. ;-)
https://badlands.substack.com/p/its-all-about-trust-law/comments?publication_id=1135129&post_id=137372598&isFreemail=true&comments=true
The Wars in the last 400 years have ALL been fought for the sake of the Banker Parasites; this includes the Revolutionary War, although the results after the establishment of the Constitution makes the Revolutionary War seem like just a Civil War. The first system we had in place was the Articles of Confederation, a decentralized system that reinforced the Sovereign aspect of Statehood to the States. There's a lot of detail to be discussed in the Federalist vs Anti Federalist issue, as well as why the Whiskey and Shay Rebellion took place ---- it has everything to do with the Bank of London; the Bankers had a stake in our Revolutionary War because the Founders "borrowed" money to fight it. When the loans became due, nobody wanted to pay them back, rightly so. Ironically, the King of Britain also borrowed money from the same Bankers. So both sides were funded by the same parasites.
We need to be seeking the right tools to take away from the Parasites. They primarily rely on us "Agreeing" to acquiesce. In my view, we could all Declare Individual Sovereignty, refuse to use the monetary system, refuse to "Register" our children with a "Cestue Que Vie" Birth Certificate. Establishing a strictly localized format for our communities, growing our own food, bartering and exchanging services.
Thank you so much for your kind words. I read your article from your comment on my other post. Great article. It was on energy vibration and frequency. Tho mine was not at the depth or level of yours. I will definately check your links out. Always enjoy learning new things and you sent me down a couple of rabbit holes already... Thank you again sir... Peace...
Fascinating comment! Thank you.
The idea of individual sovereignty goes back at least as far as Ancient Britain. "The whole Island was considered to be under one Crown—the crown itself subject to the "Voice of the Country"; hence the maxim, "the Country is higher than the King," which runs through the Ancient British Laws, and was directly opposed to the Feudal system in which the country itself was dealt with as the property of the King" - as practised in Continental Europe. All Britons were sovereign. The King was no more and no less than the first among equals.
Thank you for your comment, I haven't really studied English Law and was not aware of that. "Voice of the Country" is similar to We The People. But it leaves itself open to different interpretations. Not sure if it was used on any documents. Where as We The People as the post stated are the first 3 words of The Constitution for the united States of America... Again Thank you for such a wonderful comment. Peace...
Great post. Thank you.
Weren't both The Republic and the federal government declared bankrupt and dissolved by FDR in The Emergency Banking Act 1933? If so, does the Constitution still apply and, if so, which one and how, please?
It's interesting to note that the idea of unalienable rights comes from the ancient Usages of Britain, which are themselves based on the laws of Troy and Ancient Greece, brought to Britain by Brutus of Troy after The Trojan War around 485 BC. "The Usages of Britain could not be altered by any act or edict of the Crown or National Convention. They were considered the inalienable rights to which every Briton was born and of which no human legislation could deprive him. Many of these usages are remarkable for their humane and lofty spirit: for instance, "There are three things belonging to a man, from which no law can separate him—his wife, his children, and the instruments of his calling; for no law can unman a man, or uncall a calling."
The most learned Jurists refer the original Institutes of our Island to the Trojan Law brought by Brutus. Lord Chief Justice Coke (Preface to Vol. iii. of Reports), affirms, "the Original Laws of this land were composed of such elements as Brutus first selected from the Ancient Greek and Trojan Institutions" ("History of Britain," (1848) by R W Morgan).
https://www.thenationalcv.org.uk/More%2016%20History%20of%20Britain%20%20by%20R%20W%20MORGAN%20(1848)%20(2).pdf
Thank you for the brief lesson on the origin of unalienable rights. And the kind words I also like your awesome question. I will have to conduct some research into the FDR issue. But in my initial view of the issue. Since I'm one of We The People, The constitution is a governmental services contract of which has very limited jurisdiction over me, a Living man of the Land jurisdiction. I would claim the President doesn't have the authority to abolish something he didn't create, That would revert to We The People. As we Created the contract. But I'm not completely sure and would have to conduct some research to confirm my suspicions. And any good investigator doesn't ask questions he doesn't have the answers to. So by your structure and word usage. I have to assume you know the answer to the question you propose. So I will have to get back to you on that... Thanks again for the wonderful comment.... Peace...
Thank you so much. You make good points.
Unfortunately, I'm an interested layman rather than a knowledgeable one; so a lot of this information goes over my head and I tend to use language too loosely. When I wrote "FDR," I meant during his administration, ie, 1933. I guess The Emergency Banking Act went through Congress before FDR gave it presidential assent.
The only answers I already have are those I can recall from reading another very interesting Substack, "Shire Herald" (https://shirenews.substack.com/) which has also written about the subject of your post, eg: https://shirenews.substack.com/p/coffee-for-the-people-anyone?utm_source=publication-search.
I also found this:
"THE "U.S. GOVERNMENT" WENT BANKRUPT IN 1933 AND IS NO LONGER A REPUBLIC"
https://famguardian.org/Subjects/LawAndGovt/LegalEthics/Corruption/USGovtBankrupt.htm
Thanks again!
I will need to conduct the research to find the sources of information, but from my information I was told that the United States Inc. has been bankrupt 3 times with the most recent being in 2003. Since the size of the corporation the final distribution of assets occurred in 2019 when Trump put the Federal Reserve under the US Treasury. Completing the third and Final Bankruptsy. Thus Trumps inauguration address of giving the Government back to the People. Trump has been bankrupt at a higher level than most so he understands the process better than most. Like I said this is third hand information so it's heresay. I would have to research each to obtain sources that are reliable before I could say all of that is actually factually true. But with good common sense it feels true. Thank you for your response for clarification. as many who read the comments on this post will be helped by your and my questions.... Peace...
Yes, I have heard that, too. It all sounds rather fake and fanciful to me. It also raises the question of why everything in "Our democracy" appears to have to be done in secret and by deception. Cui bono? It reminds me of the alleged courts martial and executions at Guantanamo. Does justice not only need to be done, but to be seen to be done? Having said all that, truth does have a habit of being stranger than fiction! Best of luck with your researches - and thanks again!
The deception is required, and so is the hiding of any trials. They are taking down a mafia that has existed for 1000's of years. A fracture occurred in the timing of the evil that allowed for a plan to be implemented to eliminate them. If we know they would know. The plan sat on a shelf for almost a century before the Assassination of JFK. The plan was dusted off and reworked. It's a dynamic situation, moves and counter moves. You are watching a movie, nothing is as it seems. Good guys are actually bad guys and bad guys are actually good guys.. One aspect of the deep state is anything the media spews put it to a mirror and turn it upside down and you are closer to the truth.... It's gonna get rough.. The roller coaster hit the high point and we are heading for the downfall into the loop de loops.... Just my humble opinion... Peace...
I found the discussion on the "Shire Herald" 'Stack:
https://shirenews.substack.com/p/the-american-civil-war-part-i-it/comments
🎯🎯🎯🎯💯🎩🎩🎩🎩🎩🎩🎩
Well done GW, well done indeed😉
And when more people in more countries around the world understand these nuances of wordage, then there will actually a revolution.😉
#ourwordisourbond #wordshavepower #wearemany #wearememory #wewillnotforgive #mistakeswereNOTmade #getlocalised
Thank You for the kind words, they are greatly appreciated. Peace...
Declaration of no confidence in my Government
Open Document for everyone to copy and use
https://fritzfreud.substack.com/p/declaration-of-no-confidence-in-my
Open Letter to all Politicians and all Governments
I disavow object refuse and reject any and all Governments their laws and actions
https://fritzfreud.substack.com/p/open-letter-to-all-politicians-and
Lawmakers are Law Breakers
... and why Anarchy is the only Solution
https://fritzfreud.substack.com/p/lawmakers-are-law-breakers
----
Law is nothing without thugs (policw) enforcing it and you accepting it.
If a contract is broken... as this is clearly... we don't need to obey... neither the police nor the IRS nor anyone especially not politicians who are all guilty as charged and should be shot.
I read your first article, I agree with the general focus of the article. Your use of the word democracy distracts from the document. We are supposed to be a Federal Republic. You wont find the word in the text of the Constitution. Also you mentioned the word Citizen, that word has 2 meanings. The first is the allegiance we hold to a country or the country we were born in. The second meaning is convoluted in dictionaries but the basis you will find is these two words. Subject To... Who's subject are you? I avoid that word without clarification. Thank you for your awesome response to my post I hope it made some sense to you... Get back on the Land jurisdiction!!! Peace..
By the word citizen I mean a responsible person caring for self and society in the best possible ways.
Democracy ditto... a rule by the people for the best of society.
I ain't no subject to no one and everyone shall be free.
Words have meanings, especially in LAW.. So if you are going to try to change a system that involves legal issues you need to know the rules of their game. We The People are supposed to be following "The Laws of Nature or of Nature's God" But too many people think they are U.S. Citizens which are corporate slaves and not free sovereigns. The founding fathers created a nation of sovereigns.
The more you know, the more you realize how much you don't know... Peace...
Great post GW. On Trump, the so-called attempts were theater to promote polarization and other things not actual assassination attempts. Proof here, a vid that is buried by hoards of distraction vids: https://www.bitchute.com/video/AVkZbQMrZ5iK
Again, this is your area of expertise, and I have very little exposure to that. My point wasn't on the assassination attempts, but how alphabet agencies that are no where in the constitution are putting boots on the necks of patriots illegally. I was making a point on the tyranny of the Federal Corporation. Thanks again for the added information on the video evidence. Peace...
Ok but you are very smart so don't be shy, any teenager can see when shots are fired, where the gun is aimed, and when the target is supposedly hit.
Thanks for the kind words, I have no expertise in those areas so I cannot confirm nor discredit any of the information. With AI and video editing software of which I have very little exposure to I would have to leave that up to the experts like you... Peace...
Actually it's all analog thinking. No matter what vid you see, incl the MSM that wants you to think he was shot, the 3rd shot is when he ducked. At that time all vids that show the shooter see him pointed away from DJT. This is one of the only vids showing the sounds, DJT, and the shooter in the same frame. But with any of the other multiple vids showing when DJT ducks on shot 3 and the shooter facing away on separate vids, this vid is nearly undebunkable.
All even besides the fact that the SS didn't clear the roof of a nearby bldg? They are that inept? And ears bleed profusely not like DJT's small drips and the odds of a micro meter graze are about a trillion to one compared to a miss or full hit, and they they do this BS shooting with squibs (blood packets) all the time and just when DJT ducked he could have easily hit ear with squibb...well the word assassination attempt should be the last choice on the list.
Contract? 'Taint no contract; no how no way. Unless you mean it in the way mafias use it.
I love healthy scepticism, The 13 independent nation states united for international commerce. They had to create a vehicle to all agree on how that was going to be conducted. It holds all of the elements of a legal contract very similar to the structure of a corporation under law. But the founders didn't create a corporation. The created a governmental services organization. Read the document to fully understand the organization and structure. We The People, Joe the plumber, Sally the seamstress, Bill the electrician are supposed to be occupying Congress, Not some corporate shill that lives off the trough. When Joe, Sally, or Bill are done with their term, they go back home and tend to their trade. The Federal offices were never supposed to be full time jobs... Thanks for the great comment... Peace...
I've often thought it would be interesting to appoint members of Congress for strictly limited terms using the same method used to select people for jury service (which I presume is a random method?).
Thank you for this. Lots of good and important information.
I suspect you are aware of Anna Von Reitz who has put out a lot of similar information? I believe she places the capture of our country back to the civil war.
She has a process people can follow to reclaim their identities based on the land and the state they were born into VS the maritime scam that re-identified us. Jordan Maxwell also discussed this subject.
(I referenced some of their work in this post. https://devanneykathleen.substack.com/p/citizen-sotu)
Anna also does a weekly webinar you can find on Rumble. (I've seen a couple.)
https://www.annavonreitz.com/
Thank you.
excellent comparison. Clearly shows we've been hijacked along the way. Maybe the 1800s mudfloods gave them a chance to take over what we once started. Then made us a corporation. This outline clearly shows the difference we should be than what we are now