The Constitution for the united States of America VS The Declaration of Independence
A Governmental Services Contract vs A document to free the people!!!
Which document is the most important and why??? In my previous writings I spoke to the fact I had to pass the Constitution to pass the 8th grade and enter High School. Yes the Declaration of independence was discussed, but we weren’t tested on it to pass the grade.
The education system is knowingly flawed, the children are taught things they won’t ever use and are required to regurgitate dates and conflicts of wars that we can’t actually prove happened the way we were taught. The winners of the wars write the history. And, we have been lied to at such a level we have generational lies that created cultures and traditions, based on Lies and not the truth. When the facts actually point to the lies. The people are too cognitive dissonance to actually confront factual evidence with an open mind. We automatically get triggered to push back against any threat to our culture or traditions.
A question I’ve proposed lately is who really won the Revolutionary War? Our courts are now and have been controlled by the Crown of England through the BAR association and their Titles of Nobility. What does BAR stand for? British Accreditation Registry. Why isn’t it AAR, American Accreditation Registry??? Because the Crown of England won’t give up their control of America!!!
What is the Constitution For the united States of America? The bare bones details are it’s a governmental services contract with 19 enumerated powers that the Governmental Services organization can conduct! Any other issues are regulated to the Independent Nation States, or We The People. We must keep this knowledge of what the Constitution is as we move through this information.
The founders of the document felt the Constitution, didn’t fully express that the “Rights” of We The People, that are given, or “Endowed by our Creator” weren’t expressed clearly enough. Therefore they Amended the document to include a “Bill of Rights” consisting of the first 10 amendments. The unalienable (un-a-lien-able) rights come from our creator not man or man’s rules.
“The Constitution for the united States of America,” notice wordage, spelling and capitalization. In law those things are important. Because there is a couple different documents that are very similar.
1 The Constitution of the United States of America.
2 THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
If you do a google search for The Constitution for the united States of America, the only results will be “The Constitution of the United States of America.” I contend this result isn’t the 1789 adopted Constitution and is a fraud that We The People have been living under for decades.
Here is an overview of the Constitution, there is a link below with the full text of the document.
Article I
Article I of the constitution is the Legislative branch the Bicameral or two houses, the Senate represented by 2 senators from each state, and the House of Representatives. The house represents the people and there is supposed to be 1 house member for every 30,000 population. The house is supposed to control the purse or money. If the people don’t like how the money is being used they can vote out the house members. Section 8 lists the 19 items or enumerates what the government is allowed to do. If it’s not in these 19 items the Federal Government has no business being involved in it!!! Please show me where in the document it creates a Corporation!!! Who thinks the Founding Fathers created a corporation? Why is this important? We will get to that later in this article.
Article II
Article II provides the powers of the executive branch, the powers of the president. The electoral college, and how each state picks electors for federal presidential elections. It also directs the President as the Commander in Chief for the Army, Navy, and Airforce. The marines are directly controlled by the President.
Article III
Article III is the Judicial branch of government or the courts. It creates the One Supreme Courts and gives congress authority to create inferior courts to the Supreme court. How many courts has Congress authorized? Congress has created 94 district level courts and 13 appellate courts. So all your county courts were not created by congress!!! These courts are of the Water Jurisdiction and are not intended for We The People!!
Article IV
Article IV Lists the other laws and articles that apply to the Federal Government.
Article V
Article V provides the ability to amend the constitution and the requirements to create an amendment to the constitution.
Article VI
Article VI Discusses treaties, bills, and how the laws of the constitution and states can interact.
Article VII
Article VII Deals with ratification of the constitution and the rules for that.
https://www.archives.gov/founding-docs/constitution-transcript Link for the text of the constitution.
This document represents a Governmental Services contract! It does NOT create a corporation!!! The first 3 words of this document are We The People!!! Why??? The first 3 words implies the document was written by We The People! The founding fathers knew the maxim of law that states “One only controls what one creates!!!” Thus We The People created “The Constitution for the united States of America” We The People are the only ones who can alter or change it!!!
Congress passed the Organic Act of 1871 when you read the act it seems they just changed the type of government for Washington D.C. Well the Constitution defines the 10 square miles of the land between Virginia and Maryland as the “Seat of the United States of America” in actuality they changed the government of the United States of America. Without any authority nor jurisdiction to do so. To change the contract required a vote of We The People. Now I get the argument that I’m viewing the “incorporation” wrong. They just incorporated like a recipe where you incorporate different ingredients, and didn’t change the government of the United States of America. Well if that is true why did they change the words of the document? And under what authority? Then we get well it’s just a minor change and doesn’t really effect anything. WRONG!!!
They changed the word “for” to the word “of” many will think there isn’t any significance to this minor change. When in fact it’s a major change and not a minor change. People will ask, “how so,” well lets look at the word for. When you use the word for you are doing something to help others or effect others. The word “of” can have a couple of meanings, but when used in this specific circumstance the meaning is “Controlled by others.” When one looks at Title 28 USC, which is the Judiciary, and organization of the Courts. Section 3002 is definitions. Item #15 A, states, “The United States is a Federal Corporation” The Organic Act of 1871 made Washington D.C. a Municipal Corporation.
Another thing that snuck in without a lot of fan fare or attention is the changing of the titles of the states. Before 1871 the states were New York State, California State, Texas State, or Montana State etc. But the Federal Government having changed their governance without any authority nor jurisdiction to do so. Became a Federal Corporation, they then franchised the states and now you have The State of New York, The State of California, The State of Texas, and The State of Montana etc. Each state then incorporated the counties and cities as franchises of the States. So the word “of” was a major change, you can’t incorporate for another. And our founding fathers didn’t create a Federal Corporation!!! If they intended to, it would have been clearly spelled out. Please show me where in the Constitution it states the founding fathers created a corporation!!!
The next issue we need to discuss is LAW, we first must restate that the Constitution creates a Governmental Services company, separate from the Nation States or We The People. A limited Federal Government service company designed to conduct international trade for the several Nation States united!
So of course if the Federal Government would have to deal in Maratime / Admirality law as that is the laws for international commerce. That is NOT the Law for We The People except is specific circumstances. The Federal Government is supposed to be controlled by the Nation States or We The People, it’s not supposed to be above the Nation States or We The People. The Organic Act of 1871 reversed that order of control putting the Federal Corporation as the head Corporation with the Nation States as Franchises of this lead corporation!!!
Article III Section 2 of the Constitution states in part “Section. 2.
The judicial Power shall extend to all Cases, in Law and Equity, arising under this Constitution, the Laws of the United States, and Treaties made, or which shall be made, under their Authority;—to all Cases affecting Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls;—to all Cases of admiralty and maritime Jurisdiction;—to Controversies to which the United States shall be a Party;—to Controversies between two or more States;— between a State and Citizens of another State,—between Citizens of different States,—between Citizens of the same State claiming Lands under Grants of different States, and between a State, or the Citizens thereof, and foreign States, Citizens or Subjects.” (I bolded the word subjects, because one definition of citizen is “Subject to” the Federal Government now views We The People as their subjects. We are above the Federal Government!)
Notice Arising under this Constitution, in the first and second line of this paragraph, (Not to include the Nation States or We The People). It then discusses the laws of the United States (WalMart). Not the land mass, the Federal Government! We need to keep the Federal Government separate and beneath the Nation States and We The People. So this begs the question do you live in the Nation State, or the Corporate Entity The United States. Do you live in XXXX State, or The State of XXXX? You see the deception everyone has fallen under? This is why I ask who’s laws do you follow, God’s Laws or Man’s Laws.
The Declaration of Independence.
When, in the course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume, among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the laws of nature and of nature’s God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights, that among these are life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. That, to secure these rights, governments are instituted among men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed. That, whenever any form of government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the right of the people to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new government, laying its foundation on such principles, and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their safety and happiness.
Prudence, indeed, will dictate that governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and, accordingly, all experience has shown, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed.
But, when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same object, evinces a design to reduce them under absolute despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such government, and to provide new guards for their future security. Such has been the patient sufferance of these colonies; and such is now the necessity which constrains them to alter their former systems of government. The history of the present King of Great Britain is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute tyranny over these states. To prove this, let facts be submitted to a candid world.
He has refused his assent to laws the most wholesome and necessary for the public good.
He has forbidden his governors to pass laws of immediate and pressing importance, unless suspended in their operation till his assent should be obtained; and when so suspended, he has utterly neglected to attend to them.
He has refused to pass other laws for the accommodation of large districts of people, unless those people would relinquish the right of representation in the legislature; a right inestimable to them and formidable to tyrants only.
He has called together legislative bodies at places unusual, uncomfortable, and distant from the depository of their public records, for the sole purpose of fatiguing them into compliance with his measures.
He has dissolved representative houses repeatedly, for opposing, with manly firmness, his invasions on the rights of the people.
He has refused for a long time, after such dissolutions, to cause others to be elected; whereby the legislative powers, incapable of annihilation, have returned to the people at large for their exercise; the state remaining in the meantime exposed to all the dangers of invasion from without, and convulsions within.
He has endeavored to prevent the population of these states; for that purpose obstructing the laws for naturalization of foreigners; refusing to pass others to encourage their migrations hither, and raising the conditions of new appropriations of lands.
He has obstructed the administration of justice, by refusing his assent to laws for establishing judiciary powers.
He has made judges dependent on his will alone, for the tenure of their offices, and the amount and payment of their salaries.
He has erected a multitude of new offices, and sent hither swarms of officers to harass our people, and eat out their substance.
He has kept among us, in times of peace, standing armies, without the consent of our legislatures.
He has affected to render the military independent of and superior to the civil power.
He has combined with others to subject us to a jurisdiction foreign to our constitution, and unacknowledged by our laws; giving his assent to their acts of pretended legislation:
For quartering large bodies of armed troops among us;
For protecting them, by a mock trial, from punishment for any murders which they should commit on the inhabitants of these states;
For cutting off our trade with all parts of the world;
For imposing taxes on us without our consent;
For depriving us, in many cases, of the benefits of trial by jury;
For transporting us beyond seas to be tried for pretended offenses;
For abolishing the free system of English laws in a neighboring province, establishing therein an arbitrary government, and enlarging its boundaries, so as to render it at once an example and fit instrument for introducing the same absolute rule into these colonies;
For taking away our charters, abolishing our most valuable laws, and altering fundamentally the forms of our governments;
For suspending our own legislatures, and declaring themselves invested with power to legislate for us in all cases whatsoever.
He has abdicated government here, by declaring us out of his protection, and waging war against us.
He has plundered our seas, ravaged our coasts, burnt our towns, and destroyed the lives of our people.
He is at this time transporting large armies of foreign mercenaries to complete the works of death, desolation, and tyranny, already begun with circumstances of cruelty and perfidy scarcely paralleled in the most barbarous ages, and totally unworthy the head of a civilized nation.
He has constrained our fellow citizens, taken captive on the high seas, to bear arms against their country, to become the executioners of their friends and brethren, or to fall themselves by their hands.
He has excited domestic insurrections amongst us, and has endeavored to bring on the inhabitants of our frontiers, the merciless Indian savages, whose known rule of warfare is an undistinguished destruction of all ages, sexes, and conditions.
In every stage of these oppressions, we have petitioned for redress, in the most humble terms. Our repeated petitions have been answered only by repeated injury. A prince, whose character is thus marked by every act which may define a tyrant, is unfit to be the ruler of a free people.
Nor have we been wanting in attentions to our British brethren. We have warned them from time to time of attempts by their legislature to extend an unwarrantable jurisdiction over us. We have reminded them of the circumstances of our emigration and settlement here. We have appealed to their native justice and magnanimity, and we have conjured them by the ties of our common kindred, to disavow these usurpations, which would inevitably interrupt our connections and correspondence. They too have been deaf to the voice of justice and of consanguinity. We must, therefore, acquiesce in the necessity, which denounces our separation, and hold them, as we hold the rest of mankind, enemies in war, in peace friends.
We, therefore, the representatives of the United States of America, in General Congress assembled, appealing to the Supreme Judge of the world for the rectitude of our intentions, do, in the name, and by authority of the good people of these colonies, solemnly publish and declare, that these United Colonies are, and of right ought to be free and independent states; that they are absolved from all allegiance to the British Crown, and that all political connection between them and the state of Great Britain is and ought to be totally dissolved; and that, as free and independent states, they have full power to levy war, conclude peace, contract alliances, establish commerce, and to do all other acts and things which independent states may of right do. And for the support of this declaration, with a firm reliance on the protection of Divine Providence, we mutually pledge to each other our lives, our fortunes, and our sacred honor.
https://www.britannica.com/topic/Declaration-of-Independence/Text-of-the-Declaration-of-Independence
There were 56 signers of that Declaration of Independence? Five signers were captured by the British as traitors, and tortured before they died. Twelve had their homes ransacked and burned. Two lost their sons in the revolutionary army, another had two sons captured. Nine of the 56 fought and died from wounds or hardships of the revolutionary war. They signed and they pledged their lives, their fortunes, and their sacred honor.
How many people died signing the Constitution for the united States of America? None!!! Which document do YOU think is more important? You see the Declaration of Independence gives us the authority to throw off a tyrant government. And tells us it’s our duty!! Which document does the deep state want us all focusing on? The one that tells the people to throw off the tyrant government or the one that states the function of government and limit’s it abilities???
Let me pick out some of the key parts to The Declaration of Independence! “to assume, among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the laws of nature and of nature’s God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.”
This section is speaking to us about God’s Laws vs. Man’s Laws. The Declaration of Independence requires for We The People The Laws of Nature or of Nature’s God!!! Not Man’s codes and Statutes!!! Who’s laws do you follow??? What does it take to commit a crime under “Natural Law.”
“That, to secure these rights, governments are instituted among men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed. That, whenever any form of government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the right of the people to alter or to abolish it,”
Deriving their powers from the consent of the governed. I contend less than 50% of eligible voters vote, this would mean over half of the governed do not consent since they don’t vote in their crooked system. When ever any form of government becomes destructive of these ends it is the right of the people to alter or abolish it!!! We the People have the Right to alter or abolish the current government. But NOT the Federal Corporation!!! Do you see the game now???
“Prudence, indeed, will dictate that governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and, accordingly, all experience has shown, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed.”
This section is stating that we don’t change governments lightly and as a society we will put up with government’s abuse for quite a while we are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable!! than to fix the real problem which is the Government Corporation!!!
“But, when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same object, evinces a design to reduce them under absolute despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such government, and to provide new guards for their future security.
When a long chain of abuse and usurpations provides evidence of a design to put them under despotism (slavery)! It is their duty to throw off such government and to provide new guards for their future security!!! Again telling us to get rid of a tyrannical government, like the one we currently have.
“Nor have we been wanting in attentions to our British brethren. We have warned them from time to time of attempts by their legislature to extend an unwarrantable jurisdiction over us. We have reminded them of the circumstances of our emigration and settlement here.”
Here is where they warned the tyrannical British Troops, they told the troops that they left England to become free of the tyranny of the crown. That the Crown doesn’t have jurisdiction!!! Funny now that same Crown of England is still abusing We the people with illegitimate jurisdictional courts. They are taking We The People of the Land Jurisdiction into courts of the Water Jurisdiction and kidnapping and enslaving, along with extortion for man created non crimes (land Pirates)!!! Or crimes that only apply to Federal Employees or citizens of the territories. NOT We The People!!! What are the requirements for a crime under “Natural Law???” We The People do not belong in courts of the Water Jurisdiction!!! There are NO courts of the Land Jurisdiction because We The People have been derelict in our duties and allowed a tyrant government to run roughshod over us because we don’t know our rights or the laws…
“by authority of the good people of these colonies, solemnly publish and declare, that these United Colonies are, and of right ought to be free and independent states; that they are absolved from all allegiance to the British Crown, and that all political connection between them and the state of Great Britain is and ought to be totally dissolved;”
By the Authority of the good people!!! The United Colonies are free and independent States!!! That They Absolve from all allegiance to the British Crown, and that all political connection between them and the state of Great Britain IS and Ought to be Totally dissolved!!! Yet we never have been free or dissolved from the Crown of England as the Crown has controlled the Judicial Branch of our government through the BAR association. If we Declared our Independence and fought a revolt against the Crown of England, why would we allow any Titles of Nobility to act in any capacity in our newly formed country??? Read my substack’s “The Real 13th Amendment” and “The real reasons for the War of 1812” to fill in the blanks of how the Crown of England continued to interfere in our government since it was established… If we are to ever become real free people, a free society, removing the Crown of England and all evidence of their existence in our government and country, needs to only exist within the accurate and historic writings that preserve our history, which will include the point of view of the losers of the wars… But to be Free we need to eliminate any Titles of Nobility from any participation of our government!!!
“as free and independent states, they have full power to levy war, conclude peace, contract alliances, establish commerce, and to do all other acts and things which independent states may of right do. And for the support of this declaration, with a firm reliance on the protection of Divine Providence, we mutually pledge to each other our lives, our fortunes, and our sacred honor.”
To conclude the document, the founders list the abilities Nation States have the power to conduct and then ask for the protection of Divine Providence, then pledge to each other their Lives, Fortunes, and Sacred Honor!!! As stated above many of the signers families were destitute and many died as a result of this document.
How far afield have we gone from the governance that was created by our founding fathers? We now have bureaucratic agencies of alphabet letters that Unconstitutionally and illegally put their boots on the necks of patriots to the point of murdering patriots for political messaging. Two attempts on Donald Trump’s life in less than 2 months provides a specific example.
This link to a good article on “Federal Law Enforcement agencies” out of control. Provides even more proof:
https://imprimis.hillsdale.edu/our-out-of-control-federal-law-enforcement-agencies/?utm_campaign=imprimis&utm_medium=email&_hsenc=p2ANqtz-_Gct2UJGUZ1asOcG8LoLYF4iEJ3iTqMFiIW8BDCKb77ljN2ScNgk7QRY8HBNtVpenDvoj8hB141glP3pGphYj8IMI9SpD7m27xm0Vv2-VXdhUz1u4&_hsmi=325212258&utm_content=aug24&utm_source=housefile
The Federal agencies are only supposed to act against Federal Employees or territorial Citizens or subjects!! NOT We The People. We The People are supposed to be Above the States and Federal Governments. Unfortunately by fraud and omission, the Corporate State took over the Federal Governance illegally. We The People have NO Proof of Work in the illegal Corporate System!!!
Read my Substack on LAW to fill in all the blanks, but to provide a brief dip into the issue! What are they calling “LAW”??? Codes and Statutes are “Color of Law” and NOT LAW!!! Codes and Statutes are Corporation Bylaws and NOT LAW. No different than WalMart’s rules and regulations for their employees.. If you don’t work for WalMart, why are you following their rules and regulations for their employees? Replace WalMart with The Federal Government!!! The United States Code applies to Federal Employees and U.S. Citizens which are not to be confused with the sovereign We The People!!!
U.S. Citizens are corporate slaves created by an illegitimate government since the Organic Act of 1871. Which took a Contracted Governmental Services Organization and made a Corporation out of it. Please prove my thesis wrong!!!
In conclusion The Declaration of Independence is way more important than the Constitution for We The People. The governmental services company has been illegally transformed into a corporation and became the lead corporation over all it’s franchises. The States, Counties, and Cities.. When the real power is within
We The People. That’s one of the reasons We The People are the first three words of the Constitution…
….Peace…
Your post here is very well written, I think you have done an excellent job in laying out precise elements of our "Legal System" that is tied into the Economic and Political spheres. I usually point out that LAW and Legalyte are not the same as Lawfulness. I tend to think that Common Law operates with a stronger connection to what is "Lawful," because of our choices of conduct between ourselves in a natural community setting. Common Law is by no means perfect either.
In October of last year, I posted this:
https://nefahotep.substack.com/p/corporate-chains-of-custody-illustrate
In this post, I also reference most of my source info on how the Trust System is really at the core of Monetary Policies, Government Policies, Corporate Control of Equities, Land Ownership, how the Corporate Government is ruling from behind a curtain, while most people are fooled into accepting the Government as a Republic. There are many dimensions to this. In this post, I referenced another substack; that corroborates the items in my post:
https://badlands.substack.com/p/its-all-about-trust-law by American Hypnotist.
There is a commenter in American Hypnotist's post that everyone should read:
He goes by "Bitter Root Services" I think the comment approximately half way down, he describes "why" the whole Globalist, Centralized System seems to keep going and why the Power to "control" something is seemingly more attractive than "owning" something.
Trusts are like Russian nesting dolls. Trust can exist inside of Trusts, inside of Trust, inside of.... well you get the idea.
In my post, Corporate Chains of Custody there is a diagram of approximately how this looks, a picture is worth a thousand words.
Bitter Root had a most wonderful exchange with myself and others; important and informative enough that I printed it out. Here is a direct link to the comment section, if you would like to check it out; I hope you will. ;-)
https://badlands.substack.com/p/its-all-about-trust-law/comments?publication_id=1135129&post_id=137372598&isFreemail=true&comments=true
The Wars in the last 400 years have ALL been fought for the sake of the Banker Parasites; this includes the Revolutionary War, although the results after the establishment of the Constitution makes the Revolutionary War seem like just a Civil War. The first system we had in place was the Articles of Confederation, a decentralized system that reinforced the Sovereign aspect of Statehood to the States. There's a lot of detail to be discussed in the Federalist vs Anti Federalist issue, as well as why the Whiskey and Shay Rebellion took place ---- it has everything to do with the Bank of London; the Bankers had a stake in our Revolutionary War because the Founders "borrowed" money to fight it. When the loans became due, nobody wanted to pay them back, rightly so. Ironically, the King of Britain also borrowed money from the same Bankers. So both sides were funded by the same parasites.
We need to be seeking the right tools to take away from the Parasites. They primarily rely on us "Agreeing" to acquiesce. In my view, we could all Declare Individual Sovereignty, refuse to use the monetary system, refuse to "Register" our children with a "Cestue Que Vie" Birth Certificate. Establishing a strictly localized format for our communities, growing our own food, bartering and exchanging services.
Great post. Thank you.
Weren't both The Republic and the federal government declared bankrupt and dissolved by FDR in The Emergency Banking Act 1933? If so, does the Constitution still apply and, if so, which one and how, please?
It's interesting to note that the idea of unalienable rights comes from the ancient Usages of Britain, which are themselves based on the laws of Troy and Ancient Greece, brought to Britain by Brutus of Troy after The Trojan War around 485 BC. "The Usages of Britain could not be altered by any act or edict of the Crown or National Convention. They were considered the inalienable rights to which every Briton was born and of which no human legislation could deprive him. Many of these usages are remarkable for their humane and lofty spirit: for instance, "There are three things belonging to a man, from which no law can separate him—his wife, his children, and the instruments of his calling; for no law can unman a man, or uncall a calling."
The most learned Jurists refer the original Institutes of our Island to the Trojan Law brought by Brutus. Lord Chief Justice Coke (Preface to Vol. iii. of Reports), affirms, "the Original Laws of this land were composed of such elements as Brutus first selected from the Ancient Greek and Trojan Institutions" ("History of Britain," (1848) by R W Morgan).
https://www.thenationalcv.org.uk/More%2016%20History%20of%20Britain%20%20by%20R%20W%20MORGAN%20(1848)%20(2).pdf