Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Nefahotep's avatar

Your post here is very well written, I think you have done an excellent job in laying out precise elements of our "Legal System" that is tied into the Economic and Political spheres. I usually point out that LAW and Legalyte are not the same as Lawfulness. I tend to think that Common Law operates with a stronger connection to what is "Lawful," because of our choices of conduct between ourselves in a natural community setting. Common Law is by no means perfect either.

In October of last year, I posted this:

https://nefahotep.substack.com/p/corporate-chains-of-custody-illustrate

In this post, I also reference most of my source info on how the Trust System is really at the core of Monetary Policies, Government Policies, Corporate Control of Equities, Land Ownership, how the Corporate Government is ruling from behind a curtain, while most people are fooled into accepting the Government as a Republic. There are many dimensions to this. In this post, I referenced another substack; that corroborates the items in my post:

https://badlands.substack.com/p/its-all-about-trust-law by American Hypnotist.

There is a commenter in American Hypnotist's post that everyone should read:

He goes by "Bitter Root Services" I think the comment approximately half way down, he describes "why" the whole Globalist, Centralized System seems to keep going and why the Power to "control" something is seemingly more attractive than "owning" something.

Trusts are like Russian nesting dolls. Trust can exist inside of Trusts, inside of Trust, inside of.... well you get the idea.

In my post, Corporate Chains of Custody there is a diagram of approximately how this looks, a picture is worth a thousand words.

Bitter Root had a most wonderful exchange with myself and others; important and informative enough that I printed it out. Here is a direct link to the comment section, if you would like to check it out; I hope you will. ;-)

https://badlands.substack.com/p/its-all-about-trust-law/comments?publication_id=1135129&post_id=137372598&isFreemail=true&comments=true

The Wars in the last 400 years have ALL been fought for the sake of the Banker Parasites; this includes the Revolutionary War, although the results after the establishment of the Constitution makes the Revolutionary War seem like just a Civil War. The first system we had in place was the Articles of Confederation, a decentralized system that reinforced the Sovereign aspect of Statehood to the States. There's a lot of detail to be discussed in the Federalist vs Anti Federalist issue, as well as why the Whiskey and Shay Rebellion took place ---- it has everything to do with the Bank of London; the Bankers had a stake in our Revolutionary War because the Founders "borrowed" money to fight it. When the loans became due, nobody wanted to pay them back, rightly so. Ironically, the King of Britain also borrowed money from the same Bankers. So both sides were funded by the same parasites.

We need to be seeking the right tools to take away from the Parasites. They primarily rely on us "Agreeing" to acquiesce. In my view, we could all Declare Individual Sovereignty, refuse to use the monetary system, refuse to "Register" our children with a "Cestue Que Vie" Birth Certificate. Establishing a strictly localized format for our communities, growing our own food, bartering and exchanging services.

Expand full comment
Tirion's avatar

Great post. Thank you.

Weren't both The Republic and the federal government declared bankrupt and dissolved by FDR in The Emergency Banking Act 1933? If so, does the Constitution still apply and, if so, which one and how, please?

It's interesting to note that the idea of unalienable rights comes from the ancient Usages of Britain, which are themselves based on the laws of Troy and Ancient Greece, brought to Britain by Brutus of Troy after The Trojan War around 485 BC. "The Usages of Britain could not be altered by any act or edict of the Crown or National Convention. They were considered the inalienable rights to which every Briton was born and of which no human legislation could deprive him. Many of these usages are remarkable for their humane and lofty spirit: for instance, "There are three things belonging to a man, from which no law can separate him—his wife, his children, and the instruments of his calling; for no law can unman a man, or uncall a calling."

The most learned Jurists refer the original Institutes of our Island to the Trojan Law brought by Brutus. Lord Chief Justice Coke (Preface to Vol. iii. of Reports), affirms, "the Original Laws of this land were composed of such elements as Brutus first selected from the Ancient Greek and Trojan Institutions" ("History of Britain," (1848) by R W Morgan).

https://www.thenationalcv.org.uk/More%2016%20History%20of%20Britain%20%20by%20R%20W%20MORGAN%20(1848)%20(2).pdf

Expand full comment
25 more comments...

No posts