Before I get deep into this post, a previous post deals a lot with this topic so it should be read to get the full understanding in this post. That post link is here:
The above post provides some background information on the original 13th amendment. Not Lincoln’s 13th amendment! Recently Joe Lange posted a good article on the first Bank of the US. That post had a lot of good informaion on the econmics of that era and other related information. I would recommend reading that article so you have the understanding of some of the issues during that time. You can find Joe Lange’s article here:
To help understand the picture, the first bank of the US was created to pay off the debt for the Revolutionary War. Hamilton pushed for the first bank to structure the repayment of that debt. Jefferson was against a U.S. Bank because nothing in the Constitution allowed it. Hamilton said the Constitution doesn’t say they can’t create a bank. Remember the Enumerated Powers Act, which is part of the constitution that says what power the States gave the Federal Government. The first bank was chartered in 1791 and signed by George Washington according to History.com. The charter was for 20 years. Putting the reautherization of the bank around 1811.
From History.com talking about protecting the executive branch from foreign interferrence: The Constitution has the following:
“If the United States was going to be different, the framers needed a founding document that fully recognized and defended against the corrupting influence of foreign money and power, particularly on the president. (my note: look at today and the China and Ukraine influence on the current President as an example)
“Article II of the Constitution gives such power to the president to run the executive branch that a president under the influence of a foreign nation would be far more dangerous than any other single individual,” says Stephen Saltzburg, professor at The George Washington University Law School. “That kind of conflict, between loyalty to the United States and loyalty to a foreign nation, would be intolerable.”
No gifts, no titles of nobility—the Constitution bars American presidents, ambassadors and elected representatives from even the appearance of quid pro quo. But several members of the Constitutional Convention argued this clause alone wasn’t enough to hedge against corruption of the highest office in the nation. Congress needed a remedy, a way to punish a president who crossed the line. By including both the emoluments clause and congressional impeachment powers in the Constitution, the founders believed they had a two-pronged attack against foreign influence. As Edmund Jennings Randolph said at the Virginia Ratifying Convention in 1788, “It is impossible to guard better against corruption.”
So, the founding fathers were well aware of the dangers of having the executive be influenced by foreign Titles of Nobility. We were about 25 years out from the creation of the country and had severe debt from the Revolutionary war. We were still in the process of kicking the Crown of England out of our country as many like Hamilton were Crown plants, or had an association or affiliation to the crown. To help solidify the soveregity of our country, several states drafted the “Titles of Nobility Amendment” (TONA). The amendment passed both houses of congress. A Constitutional Convention was held and the process of ratifying the 13th amendment titled “The Titles of Nobility Amendment” was submitted and discussed. In 1811 the act was included in the National Statutes at Large which codifies the act and requires the codes to be changed to accept this Amendment. The Statutes at Large weren’t re-drafted until 1845, 34 years later, so many people thought that it was the 13th Amendment and properly ratified.
President Munroe was aligned with Thomas Jefferson, and his claim to fame is the Munroe Doctrine which told the world that the continent of north america was closed to colinization from european countries. Monroe tasked his Secretary of State John Quincy Adams with determining if TONA was properly Ratified. What do we know of John Quincy Adams before his presidency? History.com states in part: “John Quincy Adams began his diplomatic career as the U.S. minister to the Netherlands in 1794 and served as minister to Prussia during the presidential administration of his father, the formidable patriot John Adams. After serving in the Massachusetts State Senate and the U.S. Senate, the younger Adams rejoined diplomatic service under President James Madison, helping to negotiate the Treaty of Ghent (1814), which ended the War of 1812. “
In Joe Lange’s article above “Battle for Control” we learned from his article “Power back to the people.
Thomas Jefferson clearly saw the difference between the two classes of people and feared the federal government choosing the side of the elite over the majority of the people. The federal government was supposed to serve and protect the people, not hand the power of the country’s money over to private bankers. Money is power and control.
The Rothschilds have lived by that mantra for generations, and they have been the family establishing and controlling central banks all over the world. That’s how they have controlled governments and their people. They’ve also started wars to protect those central banks.
The War of 1812 was one of those wars.”
The War of 1812 was started by the Rothschilds because the US rejected the rechartering of a central bank. Most people know of the war of 1812 but don’t really know why the war was started. Along with not rechartering the central bank that was known to be aligned with The Crown of England. The people were ratifing an amendment that would keep Titles of Nobility from serving in any federally elected office and if you held a Title of Nobility you had to renounce your citizenship to the USA! We aren’t taught that but they go hand and glove in alignment with each other. Many want to argue for allowing Titles of Nobility to serve as Federal officers. Why would we want to allow the Crown of England to have elected officials in our government? Isn’t that a severe conflict of interest? Shouldn’t Americans run America and not the Crown of England? Hadn’t we just fought a war to kick England out of our country?
From Wikipedia on The Titles of Nobility Amendment: “The purpose of this Amendment was to prevent those holding foreign titles, and thus the allegiance demanded by those titles, from being able to run for an office of government in the newly created Republic. This was out of fear that the foreign powers bestowing those titles would use them as markers to call in favors to either pass or impede the passing of unfavorable laws.
Legislative and ratification history[edit]
Ratified amendment
Rejected amendment
The Titles of Nobility Amendment was introduced in the Senate by Democratic–Republican Senator Philip Reed of Maryland,[5] was passed on April 27, 1810, by a vote of 19–5[6] and sent to the House of Representatives for its consideration. It was passed by the House on May 1, 1810, by a vote of 87–3.[7] Having been approved by Congress, the proposed amendment was sent to the state legislatures for ratification and was ratified by the following states:[8]
Maryland – December 25, 1810
Kentucky – January 31, 1811
Ohio – January 31, 1811
Delaware – February 2, 1811
Pennsylvania – February 6, 1811
New Jersey – February 13, 1811
Vermont – October 24, 1811
Tennessee – November 21, 1811
North Carolina – December 23, 1811
Georgia – December 31, 1811
Massachusetts – February 27, 1812
New Hampshire – December 9, 1812
The amendment was rejected by Virginia (February 14, 1811),[9] New York (March 12, 1812), Connecticut (May 13, 1813), and Rhode Island (September 15, 1814). No other state legislature has completed ratification action on it.
When the proposed amendment was submitted to the states, ratification by 13 states was required for it to become part of the Constitution; 11 had done so by early 1812.
On February 27, 1818, President James Monroe communicated to Congress the record shown above. He and Congress were both satisfied that the required number of ratifications had not been reached. A law, passed April 20, 1818, placed official responsibility for overseeing the amendment process into the hands of the Secretary of State, where it remained until 1950.[8]”
The amendment didn’t pass, but why do I confuse the War of 1812 with the passage of TONA? Well what happened during the war of 1812? Washington DC and the Capitol were burned to the ground during the war, destroying all evidence of the ratification of amendments!!!
This is the playbook of the deep state, when people do something you don’t like start a war to eliminate all of the evidence. Wikipedia has some good information but needs to be taken with a grain of salt. If two of the states had changed their mind and the amendment became ratified, why destroy all of the evidence of ratification? On the other hand maybe they just wanted to destroy all historic documents and the amendment ratification was just part of the total of documents that were destroyed. We do know from the research conducted in the 1980’s that shows enough of the state constitutions at the time had language in the state constitutions that would have ratified the amendment.
In more current times, there is rumor, and I coundn’t confirm or deny Oklahoma city reference to destroying evidence of the Clinton’s Whitewater evidence. When I did a google search on whitewater evidence in the Murrah Federal Building. The New Yourk Times, Washington Post, Reuters, FBI.gov, USA Today, Wikipedia, Fact Check.org and numerous other sites repeated the same mantra. To me that is an indication of propaganda. A search of Freespoke.com provided the same information, along with this post: https://factcheck.afp.com/doc.afp.com.33D49D4 Talking about a repeat of the rumor that Killary Clinton avoided an indictment after Trump was indicted. Apparently on X formerly Twitter the rumor resurfaced. It discussed the rumor that there were Clinton whitewater documents in the Murrah Federal Building.
They hide things in plain sight. Think about the loss of control if the TONA was passed. It’s very evident right now that our court system is controlled by the Crown of England. A good link about that is here: https://aim4truth.org/2018/05/04/the-british-crown-runs-the-u-s-legal-system/ Again, I state as I’ve said in other writings I’ve posted. The British Accrediation Registry (BAR) controls our courts. Many will argue that there is an American BAR that controls the courts. If so why do they retain the word British? If it looks like a duck, quacks like a duck, swims like a duck, waddles like a duck, and you tell me it’s an eagle I’m calling BS!!! Why isn’t it the American Accrediation Registry? They are using Codes and Statutes which is Color of Law and not law. Law is science, real science, not the bought and paid for medical science that has promoted the Bio-Weapon as a vaccine.
Joe Rogan stated it beautifully here: “Law is a bunch of words written on paper by people who are generally considered to be liars and thieves. So let's try to figure out what's right rather than what's legal. - joe rogan.” Law is the only area where they can define the time that the moon is visible, with all the stars, and the sun isn’t out as Day! So in Law they can turn night into day and make rulings based on that “LAW.” Which is why I often ask “What law does the Declaration of Independence require for We The People?”
This is why TONA is so important, it would keep lawyers from holding an elected office. How many members of the House and Senate, and how many Presidents were Lawyers? A better way to ask this question is, “how many people who hold a Title of Nobility and swore an oath to a Monarchy, to which they hold the strongest alligence. Have held positions of trust and power within our government.” I would follow that up with how many times did they vote to support a foreign government, or our government against We The People? Isn’t that the definition of treason?
The good news is that TONA was suspended, it can be brought back up for a vote at any constitution convention, and we can even push for a constitutional convention specifically to install TONA. I hope this provided you with some new information and some issues you hadn’t considered. The more we know the harder it becomes to lie to us!!! Peace…
WHOA! Thanks to you, Grow Wizard & others, I'm coming to realize the enormity of the deception and covert evil that's been thrust upon We the People. We've been defrauded of our heritage, our natural laws, & our votes, among other things.
Just look at Texas. They, along with a couple of other States, have borne the brunt of this invasion of illegal and non vetted immigrants, which has been aided & abetted by ICE agents! The State of Texas is having to ignore a Supreme Court ruling to defend its border, which is a right granted to it under our Constitution! Even Mayorkas himself, in fall 2023, admitted the need for a wall.
In the last week, a nursing student at the University of Georgia in Athens was murdered, while out running, by an illegal alien from Venezuela who had arrived in the country in 2022 and had several previous brushes with US law. Under Trumps administration, he would have been deported. Tragically, Athens is a sanctuary city.
(NoFilterMike, thejoker1111)