A Recant to my previous posts regarding The Act of 1871 and most of the issues of corporate take over of our government.
The intentional deception to confuse and confound the public need abolished.
I recently watched this video, it revealed some critical information that I was not able to locate during my previous research. I still need to research some of the information. The information provided uses originating documents to explain the deceptions we have been exposed to. It has also spawned numerous questions to follow up. I would be greatly interested what some of the great thinkers in Substack think on this subject.
https://rumble.com/v5oznik-the-corporation-illusion-unmasking-1871-discussion-with-the-author-melody-j.html?e9s=src_v1_ucp
This subject effects my substacks titled “Lawless Criminals in Charge of Government, The power of the small word of, The Constitution vs The Declaration of Independence.” In several of my post I put in the post “prove me wrong please!” This video appears to prove many of my theories as invalid. So it sparked many questions.
While it was shown that the word “of” appears to be used even by George Washington regarding the Constitution, it seems the focus of the Organic Act of 1871 caused the public to take a more official notice. And while they state that the Organic act of 1871 only took two cities within the District and made one governing body to over see the whole district. The constitution declares that the land mass discussed is the “Seat of the United States of America.” If you make an Act to effect one does that automatically effect both? At what time did the change of states occur, from Commiefornia State to the State of Commiefornia?
Other questions also posted in the comments of this video:
." 1. The Declaration of Independence, We The People are declaring our independence from the King of England. In doing so, we state what laws we intend to follow. Thus within the very first paragraph (it's that important) The Laws of Nature or of Nature's God. I've heard War Hamster state that, "The Declaration isn't a legal document or is not used in law. My interpretation is the laws we the people are supposed to follow are "The Laws of Nature or of Natures God. Because our rights come from our creator not man. Therefore Gravity is a law of Nature, and a good example of the laws we are supposed to follow.
2. It is my understanding that Codes and Statutes are Corporate By laws and not LAW. Thus they are Color of Law and Not Law per USC Title 18 section 242. Natural law is Gravity, the 4 laws of Thermodynamics, Newton's law of motion, etc. The anti federalists didn't intend for We The People to follow Codes and Statutes but Natural law NOT Common Law, Nature's law. Similar to The Several States creating A confederation to create a Governance system for international trade using international law that does NOT apply to We The People..
3. This is a follow up to #2, which is Jurisdiction, I am of the opinion LAW = Land, Air, Water, 3 Authorities, 3 Jurisdictions, 3 Constitutions. The Constitution is the highest Law of the Land jurisdiction. Why are all our courts of the Water Jurisdiction.
These are the first 3 that popped into my mind. I’m interested in any and all comments on this issue. Thanks for reading my posts…
I completely agree with you on your point. It makes sense to continue to dig into and analyze everything we research carefully.
Nothing that is written can be in a state of absolute truth. This goes for corrupt Law such as found in Legal Code, up to including the best concisely written Common Law.
Legalese ambiguity speaks for itself on this.
Nature's Law is in my opinion a different way to express what is in my traditions as "Dharma" and Sva Dharma (Self Law) Unfortunately, most North Americans who know just a little about this have a distorted concept of what those words mean, so Nature's Law works best.
Can we Trust the Written Laws? I say No.
Nothing can be Trusted that is not Reciprocated. What has the Legal System done to, or for anyone? In short, it's codified theft in almost every facet.
The The Organic Act of 1871, it's not just a Corporate Structure it's a Network of them. And those Franchises are what actually operates, coordinates and enforces the Legal Code.
Another important thing that happened around 1868 to 1871 was the 14th Amendment, which was an affront against "Natural Birth Rights." On paper, it reduced the status of Sui Juris to "US persons." 14th amendment was never properly ratified because they lacked quorum.
In making sense of anything Legal, we find ourselves quickly getting lost in a jungle of word use inversion, convoluted definitions often hidden in plain sight; the intention of which is to sow mental confusion, resulting in subjugation of the Mind. The etymology of "Government" is Mind Control.
Have to say I like your posts. You’re going in the right direction, but it’s a little more involved in that. It includes the postmaster general and what the postmaster general function is let me point you in a direction Jay Russell Gould.